| CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) | |
|
+3Sigizmund Amedeo Guillet De Nansouty 7 participants |
|
Auteur | Message |
---|
De Oudinot Admin
Carnet militaire. Affecté : Etat-Major
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Mer 19 Fév - 13:49 | |
| Thx CER for fairplay GG FRP | |
|
| |
Chromey
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Mer 19 Fév - 13:32 | |
| Well since Cesare and Cincinato have unfriended me on steam and have left CER Steam Group Im going to assume I am the only one left to represent CER team and thus can speak for all members. WE finally concede victory to FRP/Russian Republic. GO for the Gold Mates! | |
|
| |
De Oudinot Admin
Carnet militaire. Affecté : Etat-Major
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Lun 17 Fév - 7:28 | |
| you need to adjust your internal problems. I need a clear answer. | |
|
| |
Chromey
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Lun 17 Fév - 5:27 | |
| Well Cincinato obviously does not concent so I won't. He is the Co-Captain of CER. Im sure Cesare doesn't. Either way its ugly way to win. By Crashes :/ | |
|
| |
Amedeo Guillet
Carnet militaire. Affecté :
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Dim 16 Fév - 20:05 | |
| I concede victory to the FRP (bad campers, and terrible connection), however, do not consider myself more of a component of the CER, given the attitude of not cooperating of Chromey and others. I have to thank the Dragons for their courtesy, availability and expertise. Pity that I do not speak french otherwise I would have asked you to enter your great clan. Excuse me if at times I was uncomfortable and annoying! | |
|
| |
De Oudinot Admin
Carnet militaire. Affecté : Etat-Major
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Dim 16 Fév - 19:59 | |
| All team confirm plz
Cincinnato confirm? Chromey confirm? Cesare confirm? | |
|
| |
Sigizmund
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Dim 16 Fév - 19:48 | |
| | |
|
| |
De Oudinot Admin
Carnet militaire. Affecté : Etat-Major
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Dim 16 Fév - 19:45 | |
| you give victory to the FRP ? no problem. | |
|
| |
Chromey
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Dim 16 Fév - 19:40 | |
| - De Oudinot a écrit:
- RULES IS:
"In case of the host crash, it will be considered as a defeat for the host team. Except if both teams are agree to rehost the game."
Agreed but today is the dead line so... I dunno. Its unfair kind of that Russians must always host because that rule plays against them.. But from my recollection since Cesare dropped first we were loosing our flank and some how my Kurasier lost to cheveluagers | |
|
| |
De Oudinot Admin
Carnet militaire. Affecté : Etat-Major
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Dim 16 Fév - 19:27 | |
| RULES IS:
"In case of the host crash, it will be considered as a defeat for the host team. Except if both teams are agree to rehost the game."
| |
|
| |
Amedeo Guillet
Carnet militaire. Affecté :
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Dim 16 Fév - 18:55 | |
| Today, Sunday, February 16th, we played against FRP. The host were CER, but for connection problems have hosted the FRP. We had France, Wesfalia and Denmark while our enemies Saxe, Britain and Spain. After 30 min Cesare crashed, but we continued despite the conversation between Chromey and Sigismund, because I wanted to continue. Then, after 10 min, I crashed and immediately after the host of the battle crashed, namely the FRP. What happens now? I'm waiting for your decision. | |
|
| |
Sigizmund
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Dim 16 Fév - 18:33 | |
| Cesaro dropped and... Thx CER for the game. | |
|
| |
Amedeo Guillet
Carnet militaire. Affecté :
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Jeu 13 Fév - 12:19 | |
| - De Nansouty a écrit:
- Hi gents ;)
I m the general admin and Oudinot is my assistant!
The clan: LE ROYAL DRAGONS!
But i understand that is not very clear. I Will do a post very soon to explain again to all people.
And we will design one admin per clan like Liberalis (GROGNARD) or Sloop (N) for exemple, in case of troubles.
Is that clear? Bien, je suis heureux avec votre explication! | |
|
| |
De Nansouty Adjudant
Carnet militaire. Affecté : Etat-major
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Jeu 13 Fév - 9:47 | |
| Hi gents ;)
I m the general admin and Oudinot is my assistant!
The clan: LE ROYAL DRAGONS!
But i understand that is not very clear. I Will do a post very soon to explain again to all people.
And we will design one admin per clan like Liberalis (GROGNARD) or Sloop (N) for exemple, in case of troubles.
Is that clear? | |
|
| |
De Oudinot Admin
Carnet militaire. Affecté : Etat-Major
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Jeu 13 Fév - 9:47 | |
|
Dernière édition par De Oudinot le Jeu 13 Fév - 9:49, édité 2 fois | |
|
| |
Amedeo Guillet
Carnet militaire. Affecté :
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Jeu 13 Fév - 9:13 | |
| - De Oudinot a écrit:
- after discussion with Cincinato, victory FRP is validated.
in the third match: CER host and choose their nation.
Map:Belguim 3
reminder of rules: in case of equality: Belgium 3 with ban on entering a house. belguim3: this map will have all the rounds to decide the teams in case of a tie. (I'll recalls that his winning rounds in 2 parts). this map is the flattest of all but a major default, there are two houses of the same side of the map. So for the sake of equality, we are prohibited from entering the houses Mes amis à emporter un peu de doute: votre nom est Les Royal- Dragons ou Les Royal Grognards et votre administrateur appelé De Nansouty ou De Liberalis? | |
|
| |
De Oudinot Admin
Carnet militaire. Affecté : Etat-Major
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Mer 12 Fév - 23:26 | |
| after discussion with Cincinato, victory FRP is validated.
in the third match: CER host and choose their nation.
Map:Belguim 3
reminder of rules: in case of equality: Belgium 3 with ban on entering a house. belguim3: this map will have all the rounds to decide the teams in case of a tie. (I'll recalls that his winning rounds in 2 parts). this map is the flattest of all but a major default, there are two houses of the same side of the map. So for the sake of equality, we are prohibited from entering the houses | |
|
| |
Amedeo Guillet
Carnet militaire. Affecté :
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Mer 12 Fév - 21:35 | |
| - De Oudinot a écrit:
- Nous n'y voyons aucun probleme, si les 3 CER sont d'accord.
J'ai donné la victoire à la FRP. Est-ce vous qui avez dit que, selon vos propres règles du jeu n'était pas valide. Ainsi, le risque de ne pas être plus crédible. Compte tenu de l'attitude indifférente de nos amis russes (n'ont pas encore répondu à notre disponibilité) et des excuses ridicules sur la traduction de vos règles, je ne leur accorder la victoire dans le deuxième match. Alors même penser Cesare et Matteo. Par ailleurs, il ya encore deux jeux dans notre situation. | |
|
| |
De Oudinot Admin
Carnet militaire. Affecté : Etat-Major
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Mer 12 Fév - 18:40 | |
| Nous n'y voyons aucun probleme, si les 3 CER sont d'accord. | |
|
| |
[Grognard]_Liberalis Diplomate
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Mer 12 Fév - 18:25 | |
| English translation- Spoiler:
Hi guys!
Sigizmund contacted me today to explain the problem he encountered with his team during the second battle (which they won).
I'm here as a mediator, in order to avoid the tournament getting stuck in endless re-matches penalizing the other teams. It's a question of time.
So, given that these Russians really don't understand shit in English, and that apparently none of them has bothered to translate the rules in russian, they did not understand that taking twice the same minor is forbidden as long as all minors haven't been played.
In short, I think that given the particular circumstances of this second battle you could grant them a victory. CER's are apparently agree. No one wants to potentially play two more (long) battles. Also, CER haven't said anything at the beginning of the battle (to my knowledge) that they took twice Sweden. Chromey, Cin, please share your opinions about that.
To avoid that the tournament drags on, I think we can make a slight bend to the rules and at the same time, remind everyone (again) about the set of rules. For instance, some did not understand , that the majors can be reused as many times as players want.
I ask the admins of the tournament to reconsider the situation. (and I will not object to a refusal).
Salut les gars ! J'ai Sigizmund qui m'a contacté aujourd'hui pour m'expliquer le petit problème qu'il a rencontré avec son équipe lors de la seconde bataille qu'ils ont gagné. Donc je me place en tant que médiateur, je ne suis pas là pour les défendre, mais surtout pour éviter que le tournoi ne s'enlise dans des re-match en pénalisant les autres équipes. Question de temps. Donc, étant donné que les russes comprennent vraiment que dalle en anglais, et qu'apparemment personne parmi eux ne s'est donné la peine de traduire les règles en russes, ils n'ont pas compris qu'il ne fallait pas réutiliser la même mineur 2 fois tant que toutes les mineures n'ont pas été jouées au sein de la même équipe. Bref, pour faire court, je pense qu'étant donné les circonstances particulières de cette seconde bataille ont peur leur laisser la victoire. Les CER sont apparemment d'accord. Aucune des deux équipes n'a envie de potentiellement se taper encore deux batailles (longues). Personne chez les CER ne leur a signalé la reprise de la Suède et tout le monde a joué jusqu'au bout. Pour éviter que le tournoi ne s'éternise, je pense qu'on peut faire une légère entorse au règlement et par la même occasion, rappeller à tout le monde les règles. Certains n'ont pas compris par exemple, que les majeures peuvent être réutilisées autant de fois qu'on veut. Je demande aux admins du tournoi de reconsidérer la situation. (et je ne m'opposerai pas à un refus). Voici le screen de victoire que Sigiz m'a filé tout à l'heure. | |
|
| |
Amedeo Guillet
Carnet militaire. Affecté :
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Mar 11 Fév - 10:51 | |
| Nous serons en mesure de jouer le vendredi 14 et samedi 15 Février, à 16 GMT pour le deuxième match contre FRP | |
|
| |
De Nansouty Adjudant
Carnet militaire. Affecté : Etat-major
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Mar 11 Fév - 0:18 | |
| Hi all.
FRP takes two times Sweden whereas the "RULES" are clear: You must take 2 differents Minors per battle and you can't repick these factions until you have picked it all.
So the game have to be played once again.
Sorry but rules are rules. We can't make exception. | |
|
| |
Amedeo Guillet
Carnet militaire. Affecté :
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Lun 10 Fév - 18:07 | |
| Je suis désolé, mais je ne suis pas d'accord avec Chromey. J'ai participé à de nombreux tournois, et j'ai vu beaucoup d'équipes qui aiment camp. C'est une tactique de bataille, que nous devons respecter, que vos règles. Sinon, nous faisons d'autres choses que nous aimons. J'attends votre décision finale, même si vous avez déjà exprimé leurs vues sur cette question. | |
|
| |
Chromey
| |
| |
De Oudinot Admin
Carnet militaire. Affecté : Etat-Major
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) Lun 10 Fév - 10:00 | |
| the victory of the "FRP" is not valid. they played 2 times sweden ( 1er match and 2e match) .
RULES: Each team are allowed to pick 1 Major and 2 Minors factions per battle. You must take 2 differents Minors per battle and you can't repick these factions until you have picked it all. Then and only then you can pick a minor faction already used.
Whereas Majors can be choose several times in same round.
And last thing, you can't take the same Nation of your opponent. | |
|
| |
Contenu sponsorisé
| Sujet: Re: CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) | |
| |
|
| |
| CER (Coalition of Gladiator) 1 VS 2 FRP (Riguard, BiA, RBTW) | |
|